Hello worldHello world
SEO, AI search and websites · DeBJExFPKUF

@edward.builds

Google's Search Central page "Google Search's guidance on using generative AI content on your website" reportedly gained a line on 1 Oct saying it is critical to manually fact-check and review all AI-generated content (including title, meta description and image alt text) before publishing; Edward reads it as another reason Google will cut scaled-AI sites.

Posted 03 Oct 2026 · 67k plays · 1k likes · 36 comments · evidence: demo/screen-proof · saved in: business

The hook

Spoken: "It turns out Alex Hormozi is running a sales funnel that's so efficient, it was deemed illegal by the government." (transcript renders the name phonetically as "Alex Ramosi") On-screen: green box "EXPOSING ILLEGAL SALES FUNNEL" over a photo of Hormozi.

Full breakdown

  1. Hook claims: Grant Cardone, Patrick Bet-David and Jeremy Haynes use it; "HIMS got sued by the FTC because their ads became too effective" (a securities class action search result is shown at 9s). "So just be careful about how you use this."
  2. The funnel is a quiz positioned as a "$100M scaling roadmap" offering free personalised business advice in under 30 seconds: fast, free, personalised ("the holy trinity of marketing").
  3. Roughly 25% of his 600 Facebook ads (Meta Ad Library screenshot) drive to this free funnel. Every YouTube video has a mid-roll or end screen to the quiz.
  4. First questions: name, email, phone number, shipping address (in 2026; reason: snail mail is cheap and works, "when everyone zigs, you zag").
  5. Last questions: number of employees, annual revenue (plus net profit margin, partner status, how long in business appear in frames). Honest answers get an accurate roadmap.
  6. Logic: headcount decides which stage of the roadmap: just you and no revenue = stage zero; just you with some revenue = stage one, and up.
  7. Revenue decides whether you get sales calls: under $250k = roadmap and a value-only path; over $250k = book-a-call page ("Want to learn how to scale your business with us in Vegas?"). Same quiz, two outcomes. (Flowchart shown at 57s, 66s.)
  8. Why $250k: Acquisition.com buys and scales companies; under-250k leads are nurtured with free content until qualified; above it his team can sell workshops and consulting now. In 3 to 10 years some may become acquisition targets (ACQ Ventures page shown).
  9. Side benefits: leads today, acquisition pipeline, market research, and ideas for his next videos; people give him real data willingly.
  10. Generalise: push traffic into a quiz, qualify prospects while giving everyone value, pick who to work with. "You give value to 100% of your leads while only selling the right ones."

Tools & links

  • acquisition.com/roadmap (the quiz), ventures.acquisition.com (ACQ Ventures page), Meta Ad Library (to inspect his ads), YouTube.
  • Creator's own offer: full breakdown via comment "ALEX" (DM). Handle @hormozi referenced.

On screen

Hybrid talking head with screen-recording cutaways: Google results on the lawsuit, acquisition.com roadmap landing page, quiz field screens (phone, shipping address, employees), Meta Ad Library, YouTube channel, flowchart of quiz branching, book-a-call page, ACQ Ventures. Word-by-word serif captions, creator holds a furry-windscreen mic.

CTA & funnel

"Comment ALEX for the full breakdown." 272 of 285 retrieved comments are "Alex"; the creator replies in comments with "Check ur DM!", "Sent!", "DM'd!" to each (comment-to-DM automation). He sells quiz funnel building, so the reel is a demonstration of the exact funnel type he builds (quiz funnel builder bio).

The format

129 s, controversy hook ("illegal funnel") then a structured breakdown, "teardown of someone famous" format borrowing authority. Screen cutaways every 3 to 6 s as proof. The 575 comments (mostly keyword) feed reach.

Comment signal

  • Overwhelmingly the keyword "Alex"; praise ("Alex is genuinely a monster in this game", 93 likes).
  • "Quizzes and online assessments made me a fortune. Best lead magnet ever" (41).
  • A commenter: "it's not illegal". Creator replies mainly with DM confirmations; no public link.

Apply it

  • Ilene Joy: a jewellery quiz ("find your charm/necklace/gift in 30 seconds") that collects name, email, phone (WhatsApp) and budget, branching high budget to a concierge/book-a-call (Ilene's builder has a concierge) and low budget to the normal collection. Works with the "Design your own" builder.
  • Healthy Manushya: a "supplement fit" quiz collecting WhatsApp number; sort by goal and send COD offer via WhatsApp; retention-ready lead data.
  • Agencies: qualification quiz for Zamn Studios/StudioHRTN/Goodform using monthly ad spend or revenue threshold to route to a call vs a free guide.
  • Own content: "teardown of a famous funnel" plus comment-keyword DM reel format.
  • Shipping address in lead forms: consider for Ilene Joy gifting follow-up (postcards), but not for India-first COD brand without consent.

Doubts & caveats

  • "Deemed illegal by the government" is clickbait and unverified: the cited item is a class action about Hims & Hers (securities), and the FTC claim is not shown; a commenter says it's not illegal. The quiz is not itself the subject.
  • "25% of 600 ads" and funnel logic are based on an observed screenshot and may change; collecting phone/address has privacy implications (India DPDP act/consent).
  • Creator sells quiz funnels, so the framing is promotional.

Full transcript

[0s] Pay attention. Google has rules for using AI content on your website. This is a new passage

[6s] that was added. It was added just yesterday on October 1st. It is critical to manually fact

[13s] check review all AI generated content for accuracy, trustworthiness before publishing.

[18s] This is on Google's rules for using AI content on your website. Generative models don't retrieve

[24s] facts predict a likely sequence of words based on their training data. Contain inaccuracies so

[30s] hallucinations. This gives Google one more reason to take out websites that are putting out scaled AI

[36s] content. The review also applies to metadata like your page title, your meta description, like alt text

[43s] for images. Google used to take the stance AI content was fine as long as it was not being used to

[48s] manipulate search results. Now it is explicitly saying you need to review your AI content.

Watch the original

instagram.com/reel/DeBJExFPKUF by @edward.builds. Preview below is the first 15 seconds.

00:00

/

00:00

More SEO