@performance.marketing.by.rohit
An EdTech brand was scaled from Rs 50 lakh/month to Rs 1.5 crore/month ad spend inside a single CBO campaign; the real lever was creative diversity (400-500+ creatives), not account structure.
Posted 01 Oct 2026 · 2k plays · 46 likes · 6 comments · evidence: anecdote (self-reported spend numbers, no dashboard shown) · saved in: content-creation-growth

The hook
Spoken: "It turns out Alex Hormozi is running a sales funnel that's so efficient, it was deemed illegal by the government." (transcript renders the name phonetically as "Alex Ramosi") On-screen: green box "EXPOSING ILLEGAL SALES FUNNEL" over a photo of Hormozi.

Full breakdown
- Hook claims: Grant Cardone, Patrick Bet-David and Jeremy Haynes use it; "HIMS got sued by the FTC because their ads became too effective" (a securities class action search result is shown at 9s). "So just be careful about how you use this."
- The funnel is a quiz positioned as a "$100M scaling roadmap" offering free personalised business advice in under 30 seconds: fast, free, personalised ("the holy trinity of marketing").
- Roughly 25% of his 600 Facebook ads (Meta Ad Library screenshot) drive to this free funnel. Every YouTube video has a mid-roll or end screen to the quiz.
- First questions: name, email, phone number, shipping address (in 2026; reason: snail mail is cheap and works, "when everyone zigs, you zag").
- Last questions: number of employees, annual revenue (plus net profit margin, partner status, how long in business appear in frames). Honest answers get an accurate roadmap.
- Logic: headcount decides which stage of the roadmap: just you and no revenue = stage zero; just you with some revenue = stage one, and up.
- Revenue decides whether you get sales calls: under $250k = roadmap and a value-only path; over $250k = book-a-call page ("Want to learn how to scale your business with us in Vegas?"). Same quiz, two outcomes. (Flowchart shown at 57s, 66s.)
- Why $250k: Acquisition.com buys and scales companies; under-250k leads are nurtured with free content until qualified; above it his team can sell workshops and consulting now. In 3 to 10 years some may become acquisition targets (ACQ Ventures page shown).
- Side benefits: leads today, acquisition pipeline, market research, and ideas for his next videos; people give him real data willingly.
- Generalise: push traffic into a quiz, qualify prospects while giving everyone value, pick who to work with. "You give value to 100% of your leads while only selling the right ones."

Tools & links
- acquisition.com/roadmap (the quiz), ventures.acquisition.com (ACQ Ventures page), Meta Ad Library (to inspect his ads), YouTube.
- Creator's own offer: full breakdown via comment "ALEX" (DM). Handle @hormozi referenced.

On screen
Hybrid talking head with screen-recording cutaways: Google results on the lawsuit, acquisition.com roadmap landing page, quiz field screens (phone, shipping address, employees), Meta Ad Library, YouTube channel, flowchart of quiz branching, book-a-call page, ACQ Ventures. Word-by-word serif captions, creator holds a furry-windscreen mic.

CTA & funnel
"Comment ALEX for the full breakdown." 272 of 285 retrieved comments are "Alex"; the creator replies in comments with "Check ur DM!", "Sent!", "DM'd!" to each (comment-to-DM automation). He sells quiz funnel building, so the reel is a demonstration of the exact funnel type he builds (quiz funnel builder bio).

The format
129 s, controversy hook ("illegal funnel") then a structured breakdown, "teardown of someone famous" format borrowing authority. Screen cutaways every 3 to 6 s as proof. The 575 comments (mostly keyword) feed reach.

Comment signal
- Overwhelmingly the keyword "Alex"; praise ("Alex is genuinely a monster in this game", 93 likes).
- "Quizzes and online assessments made me a fortune. Best lead magnet ever" (41).
- A commenter: "it's not illegal". Creator replies mainly with DM confirmations; no public link.

Apply it
- Ilene Joy: a jewellery quiz ("find your charm/necklace/gift in 30 seconds") that collects name, email, phone (WhatsApp) and budget, branching high budget to a concierge/book-a-call (Ilene's builder has a concierge) and low budget to the normal collection. Works with the "Design your own" builder.
- Healthy Manushya: a "supplement fit" quiz collecting WhatsApp number; sort by goal and send COD offer via WhatsApp; retention-ready lead data.
- Agencies: qualification quiz for Zamn Studios/StudioHRTN/Goodform using monthly ad spend or revenue threshold to route to a call vs a free guide.
- Own content: "teardown of a famous funnel" plus comment-keyword DM reel format.
- Shipping address in lead forms: consider for Ilene Joy gifting follow-up (postcards), but not for India-first COD brand without consent.

Doubts & caveats
- "Deemed illegal by the government" is clickbait and unverified: the cited item is a class action about Hims & Hers (securities), and the FTC claim is not shown; a commenter says it's not illegal. The quiz is not itself the subject.
- "25% of 600 ads" and funnel logic are based on an observed screenshot and may change; collecting phone/address has privacy implications (India DPDP act/consent).
- Creator sells quiz funnels, so the framing is promotional.

Full transcript
[0s] So we scale one brand from 50 lakh spend a month to 1.5 CR spends a month with just one campaign.
[10s] Just one campaign.
[11s] And it has around some 30, 40 plus different courses.
[14s] It's an edtech brand, but just one campaign.
[16s] So I just wanted to say here that it is possible.
[19s] And you don't need thousands of different campaigns, retargeting a different campaign and then a testing campaign and etc.
[25s] All of this is hoax.
[27s] It's unnecessary.
[28s] it's not the major liver i would say if hygienes are being met that is not the liver your creatives
[35s] your landing page those are the livers where it's set so it has happened with us and it i think i
[40s] have a life example with me right now so um and we were also for that thought maybe it may happen
[46s] maybe it may not happen but we took that call like one single campaign multiple ad sets all in cbo so
[51s] one campaign one cbo there are some you know 50 plus different ads for multiple courses bundles
[57s] remarketing and everything is in under cbo there is no um only exclusions i mean we have is of
[63s] existing customers nothing else and we just let meta decide and we have scaled so anyone who is
[71s] selling you there is a magical account structure there is none you can scale an account from x to
[77s] y um no matter what but campaign structure is not that that liver or that secreting hidden that
[83s] looking for that is obviously creatives what one thing we did is we scaled our number of creatives
[89s] significantly higher 400 500 plus creatives used to launch because there were multiple different
[94s] courses so scale was different and also diversity being short uh even in formats even personas that
[101s] we are targeting there is significantly um you know they are they're creative should be diverse
[106s] and everyone every course has a different landing page etc and all of that was already in place
[110s] so diversity helped us but that was one key lever and not the campaign structure so don't fall for
[116s] any magical campus structure because sometimes that is the easiest route to find a campaign
[120s] structure but what's difficult is to find diversity in creatives finding new messaging new persona
[125s] to go after that is difficult to crack but that's what moves the needle okay so that's the learning
[131s] for this

Watch the original
instagram.com/reel/Dd83hWNjzaK by @performance.marketing.by.rohit. Preview below is the first 15 seconds.
00:00
/
00:00



